Polls Archive

• Not sure. Bieniemy will certainly get interviews because of the Rooney Rule (teams required to interview minority candidates), but there doesn't seem to be much buzz about his hiring. We'll see ... (53%, 158 Votes)
• No. I don't know if its Bieniemy's failure as an OC at CU, that he is a "bad interview", or just doesn't have the right personality to be a head coach, but I don't see it happening (30%, 90 Votes)
• Yes. Bieniemy has paid his dues, and has had a hand in the putting together a creative and record-setting offense. CBS has Bieniemy going to MIami, and I can see that happening (17%, 52 Votes)

Start Date: January 19, 2022 @ 6:41 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• If it weren't for bad news, CU wouldn't get any news at all. When will the bleeding stop? Will CU be posting a JV team next fall? It's starting to sound like it (with a record like 2-10) (36%, 129 Votes)
• Not really surprised. Watts (senior being replaced), Miller (often injured) and Stanley (never happy in Boulder) are not bad losses. CU making room for transfers - let's see who they get (34%, 122 Votes)
• Just glad to see that the coaching staff is finally in place (Welcome, coach McGeoghan!). Coach Dorrell wants to build a culture with his coaches and players. At least the coaches are in place (30%, 108 Votes)

Start Date: January 18, 2022 @ 5:49 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• The path to the 85-man roster in August is a marathon, not a sprint. Let's see what CU and its boosters come up with before we celebrate or complain. Fingers crossed (53%, 146 Votes)
• Really?? CU's top starters are gone; the rest of the Pac-12 has loaded up on better players, and CU is just now getting around to getting something going? Disappointed, to say the least (38%, 104 Votes)
• Good news! CU (and its fan base) are well behind the curve when it comes to NIL and getting recruits and transfers interested in CU (not to mention keeping stars). Can't wait for more info (9%, 23 Votes)

Start Date: January 17, 2022 @ 5:51 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• Not as bad as I thought, actually. Even with the defections, CU has 13 returning starters, with some decent depth. These are your guys ... Time to coach 'em up, Dorrell & Co. (38%, 105 Votes)
• I'm just amazed that CU is one over the 85-man limit. Why is Dorrell using a scholarship on a project OL when there are so many units which need immediate help? I don't get CU's roster strategy (37%, 104 Votes)
• Yikes. With six starters leaving, the lack of experienced talent at running back and in the secondary are glaring. I hate to be blunt, but I can't see this lineup being competitive in 2022 (25%, 70 Votes)

Start Date: January 16, 2022 @ 5:37 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• The defection of a half dozen starters. The Buffs were 4-8 with these star players (not to mention Landman, Wells and Johnson). What record will CU produce without them? (35%, 105 Votes)
• That there are no CU boosters (Buff Club? C-Club? Buffs4Life?) taking the lead to create NIL funds to compete for players. Complaining about the system doesn't help; CU (and its fans) need to step up (35%, 105 Votes)
• That CU - in Year Three of the Karl Dorrell era - still isn't competing for top talent on the Recruiting trail. Arizona - 1-10 Arizona - has a Top 25 recruiting Class. Why can't CU? (30%, 88 Votes)

Start Date: January 15, 2022 @ 5:39 pm
End Date: No Expiry