Polls Archive

• Yes. CU has been to four bowl games in the past 20 years, and lost all four. The Buffs - and their fans - deserve to have some positive momentum a bowl bid would represent (52%, 51 Votes)
• It would depend. If the Buffs finished the season with some momentum (after a tough first half schedule), or were battling injuries, I could see the advantages of playing in a bowl game (32%, 32 Votes)
• No. Even if the Buffs won the game (unlikely, since they would go going against a team with a winning record), the Buffs would still finish with a losing season. Give up the season and focus on 2027 (16%, 16 Votes)

Start Date: May 8, 2026 @ 4:22 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• Nothing. There is nothing about having 76 teams play which is good. Get ready for teams which finished 9th or 10th in the Big Ten and SEC lobbying for inclusion. March Madness was great: This isn't (70%, 55 Votes)
• That my team, which often seems to be on the outside looking in, will have a better chance of making it to March Madness ... or at least have more meaningful games in February and early March (28%, 22 Votes)
• Instead of eight teams playing in four games in Dayton for a chance to advance, there will now be 24 teams playing in 12 such games (including out west). The more the merrier! (2%, 2 Votes)

Start Date: May 7, 2026 @ 4:53 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• That Colorado will not make a bowl game. CU will have to double its win total from last season to go bowling, and it's hard to see the 2026 team as being twice as good as last year's team (41%, 31 Votes)
• That Texas Tech is the Big 12's lone CFP participant, and does not receive a first round bye. The Big 12 has several good teams, but no great ones. The Big 12 won't get two participants in the CFP (36%, 27 Votes)
• That Oklahoma State will go from 1-11 to a bowl bid. This is what happens when you hire a coach who can bring along an All-Conference level quarterback and several quality skill position players (23%, 18 Votes)

Start Date: May 6, 2026 @ 5:57 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• Somewhat confident. Yormark is seeking out new options, but I don't know if there are enough options to keep the Big 12 relevant (64%, 60 Votes)
• Not confident. Yormark has been on the job for over three years now. Is the Big 12 better off? Have huge deals been made to bring in more funding? I'm not impressed (24%, 23 Votes)
• Very confident. Yormark is an innovator, and continues to think outside the box. If the Big 12 is going to survive and prosper, we'll need Yormark and his team (12%, 11 Votes)

Start Date: May 5, 2026 @ 4:49 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• This is absurd. Big Ten schools are getting $70/$80 million, while Big 12 schools are getting are getting less than $30 million? And that's every year? Let the Big Two split off and be done with it (43%, 40 Votes)
• What struck me was the Big Ten's total distribution was $340 million higher than what the Southeastern Conference reported. Three straight national titles for the Big Ten ... and counting? (40%, 37 Votes)
• Teams still have to develop players, and have coaches with game plans. It's not as if Nebraska and Oklahoma didn't have significantly more resources back in the days of the Big Eight (17%, 16 Votes)

Start Date: May 4, 2026 @ 4:35 pm
End Date: No Expiry