Polls Archive

• "I think there is a sense of urgency that our players have kind of embraced of, 'Let's get ourselves ready to go.' We have to make up for a lot of time" (71%, 120 Votes)
• "The testing process (for COVID-19) will start this week ... I would say the bulk of the team (will be) here (next week) and ready to go" (17%, 29 Votes)
• "I think because of this pandemic everybody is in the same boat so it actually puts us on a level playing field, in my opinion" (12%, 19 Votes)

Start Date: June 8, 2020 @ 5:55 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• I was interested to see that both Arizona and UCLA had even fewer players listed ... an indication of how wide open the Pac-12 South is going to be ... take advantage, Buffs! (48%, 71 Votes)
• Sounds about right. When you have one bowl appearance in 12 years, you are not going to get much preseason love (especially with a new coach and no known quarterback) (34%, 51 Votes)
• All you need to know about anti-CU bias: Stanford, which went 4-8 last season, has 12 players on the list, double that of CU - another preseason ranking to ignore (18%, 26 Votes)

Start Date: June 7, 2020 @ 5:38 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• That CU is even being allowed to move forward ... I thought that either the city, county or state would find a way to keep the Buffs from keeping up with other Pac-12 schools (51%, 92 Votes)
• A seven-day quarantine for those who arrive from out of state before they can begin any workouts, and physicals for all of the athletes. It sounds like CU has a sound strategy to get athletes back (27%, 49 Votes)
• That Buffs coaches could soon be returning to their offices instead of working remotely - they need all of the in-person time together as humanly possible (22%, 39 Votes)

Start Date: June 6, 2020 @ 5:55 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• It won't effect schools that prioritize sports, but I am afraid that it will have a chilling effect on some schools (like CU), which will insist on going slow - to the detriment of their programs (47%, 71 Votes)
• It will have no effect on slowing things down. There is too much momentum (read: the need to make money) to stop college football (or other sports) from getting back in gear (33%, 50 Votes)
• It will have the effect of slowing things down. Schools are in such a rush to get players back on campus, that they are actually jeopardizing the season by opening too soon (20%, 29 Votes)

Start Date: June 5, 2020 @ 6:57 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• Nothing surprises me ... other than that we are talking about it. This staff hasn't had one practice with these players ... Hope there are plenty of erasers handy for this "pencil depth chart" (70%, 131 Votes)
• Odd to see not three, not four, but five linebacker positions. CU looking at going from a 4-3 to basically a 3-5-4. It will be interesting to see how this plays out (22%, 41 Votes)
• I thought it was interesting that Tyler Lytle was listed as the starter at quarterback - no "or" here. It looks likes its Lytle's job to lose (5%, 10 Votes)
• I found it strange that K.D. Nixon, who will be the senior leader - and presumed star - of the wide receiver corps, is listed as the No. 1 kick returner and No. 2 punt returner (3%, 5 Votes)

Start Date: June 4, 2020 @ 6:08 pm
End Date: No Expiry