Polls Archive

• Would have been happy today ... if not for the Boulder County announcement. Now, the rest of the Pac-12 can practice, but CU can't. Karl Dorrell can't buy a break (70%, 184 Votes)
• Glad to get things going. It will be interesting to see how they put the schedule. Division games plus one-crossover game? Can't wait to see the schedule - Go Buffs! (13%, 33 Votes)
• It's a joke. A six/seven-game conference schedule won't get the Pac-12 into the College Football Playoff. I feel sorry for the players, who will get in half of a season (in front of zero fans) (12%, 31 Votes)
• They shouldn't have put $$ ahead of safety. No CFP, so this is all about getting the New Year's Six money (5%, 13 Votes)

Start Date: September 24, 2020 @ 6:08 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• Games to begin November 7th ... Since the Pac-12 wasn't gearing up to play this fall (until last week when the Big Ten reversed course), it will take an extra week to get the teams on the field (45%, 95 Votes)
• Games to begin October 24th ... though not necessarily every team will play. There may be some allowance for non-California teams to start early and have a bye week or a non-conference game (29%, 60 Votes)
• They will either vote to keep the suspension until January 1st, or put in so many restrictions that games won't be able to be played. The Pac-12 will show its true colors (26%, 55 Votes)

Start Date: September 23, 2020 @ 5:04 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• Good for the Mountain West. If this will help the Pac-12 get its act together and vote Thursday to play this fall, then this is good news (44%, 84 Votes)
• I'm just wondering whether the Pac-12 will allow teams who want to play (including possibly CU?) to actually play. Perhaps CU v. CSU on October 24th? (33%, 63 Votes)
• The Mountain West is different from the Pac-12. I guess the country doesn't understand that the Pac-12 has California schools who have restrictions ... oh, wait, the MWC has three California teams (23%, 46 Votes)

Start Date: September 22, 2020 @ 5:00 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• That Nebraska, after being the leading proponent of playing this fall, is bitching about its revised schedule, which includes an opening date at Ohio State (52%, 142 Votes)
• That Larry Scott and others received significant bonuses (which had been moved up in time) a month before almost half of the employees for the Pac-12 were laid off (39%, 107 Votes)
• That Stanford is (reportedly) the leading dissenting voice in the Pac-12's debate over playing football this fall, citing health and safety concerns (9%, 22 Votes)

Start Date: September 21, 2020 @ 5:09 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• Low. The Pac-12 came up with the contract for daily testing, and then did nothing. If the Big Ten hadn't acted, the Pac-12 would still be sitting on its hands. It's been an embarrassment (74%, 166 Votes)
• Medium - really, it's an "incomplete". We'll see how the meetings go this Thursday. I am hopeful that there will be a good plan ... but I have my concerns (20%, 44 Votes)
• High. The Pac-12 has been the most deliberate conference this fall, and that is paying dividends. The conference will have a plan which will give the fans football while keeping the players safe (6%, 13 Votes)

Start Date: September 20, 2020 @ 5:02 pm
End Date: No Expiry