Polls Archive

• Good idea. This will help widen the scope of available athletes, and help CU be more competitive (46%, 82 Votes)
• I'm okay with it ... it's the way of the world. Just wish CU didn't have to use this particular tool to keep up (44%, 79 Votes)
• Bad idea. Stanford doesn't compromise standards, neither should Colorado (10%, 19 Votes)

Start Date: April 26, 2014 @ 1:23 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• Undecided. Perhaps, if the game was treated like a game at Hawai'i, allowing CU to pick up a 13th (and home) game (49%, 88 Votes)
• Thumbs down! Even with extra TV revenue, it's a net loss if CU loses another game in Folsom (36%, 65 Votes)
• Thumbs up! The game would get national exposure, something the CU program needs (15%, 28 Votes)

Start Date: April 25, 2014 @ 1:07 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• Fine. CU was the underdog last year and won by two touchdowns. Place the bet! (50%, 109 Votes)
• Sounds about right. Both teams have question marks heading into the 2014 season, and the game is always close (33%, 72 Votes)
• Surprised that CSU isn't the favorite - an 8-4 team v. a team with no winning seasons in eight years? (17%, 36 Votes)

Start Date: April 24, 2014 @ 3:58 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• Vote against joining the union. There are other - and better - means by which to handle student-athlete issues (77%, 147 Votes)
• Vote to join the union. Players need representation, and, ultimately, some sort of pay-for-play (23%, 45 Votes)

Start Date: April 23, 2014 @ 12:21 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• The timing really doesn't matter. Either he returns or he doesn't - wake me when there is news! (55%, 120 Votes)
• Good news for the Buff Nation! It means that staying is still very much in the running! (26%, 56 Votes)
• Means nothing. Dinwiddie is just getting everything lined up to leave, nothing more (19%, 43 Votes)

Start Date: April 22, 2014 @ 2:23 pm
End Date: No Expiry