CU's best chance at a home Pac-12 "upset"
- Oct. 17th - Arizona Wildcats (63%, 182 Votes)
- Nov. 7th - Stanford Cardinal (18%, 52 Votes)
- Sorry, but I don't foresee CU winning any of those games (8%, 24 Votes)
- Oct. 3rd - Oregon Ducks (7%, 19 Votes)
- Nov. 13th - USC Trojans (4%, 11 Votes)
Start Date: May 25, 2015 @ 4:09 pm
End Date: No Expiry
CU's chances to move out of the cellar in the Pac-12 South
- Pretty good. The team played better last year, and the addition of DC Jim Leavitt will make the difference (57%, 128 Votes)
- Slim. It will take not only CU stepping up, but another team stepping back, for CU to move up (36%, 82 Votes)
- None. It's hard to see CU moving past any of the five teams above them in 2015 (7%, 15 Votes)
Start Date: May 24, 2015 @ 9:43 am
End Date: No Expiry
CU's take from the Pac-12 $21.1 million in FY 2014
- Considering it was about $18M the year before, and only $3.4M (partial cut) in FY12 - I'm happy (57%, 107 Votes)
- Like the upward trend, but I'm wary of the Pac-12 falling behind the SEC and Big Ten in future years (37%, 69 Votes)
- This is just the beginning of the end, as 100% ownership of the Pac-12 Networks will drag down the league (6%, 13 Votes)
Start Date: May 22, 2015 @ 4:44 pm
End Date: No Expiry
ESPN does not rate any CU offensive unit higher than 8th in Pac-12
- The rankings are fair. Until proven otherwise, CU's offense is a part of the problem, and why the Buffs are continously ranked in the bottom third of the conference (68%, 159 Votes)
- Too low on most. These rankings are being posted more on won/loss records than results - CU's offense is not the problem (32%, 75 Votes)
Start Date: May 21, 2015 @ 10:48 am
End Date: No Expiry
NFL adopting a 32-yard extra point. Should the NCAA follow suit?
- Maybe. Give it a year or two in the NFL, to see what issues might arise, before changing the rule (50%, 103 Votes)
- No. There is nothing wrong with having differences (like hashmark locations) between the NFL and NCAA (35%, 71 Votes)
- Yes. It would add some interest and intrigue to the extra point attempt (15%, 31 Votes)
Start Date: May 20, 2015 @ 8:01 am
End Date: No Expiry
6 Replies to “Polls Archive”
Stuart:
I like the question about SS’s negative coverage. Personally, I think the see-saw coverage is mostly about “stirring the pot” and/or getting clicks. SS is this year’s draft soap opera–a love/hate fest For one negative story there is a more positive one. Some stories are just hit jobs (anonymous NFL assistant/exec), others just cover every minutia of his life. Yesterday, Kiper has him still going early.
SS is an intriguing draftee warranting discussion, however the extensive overall coverage on every detail for one QB prospect seems over the top. NFL teams have their draft boards, needs, and evaluations and they make decisions based upon that. I’ll be glad when SS and TH are picked today and the focus will be on our team.
The Buffs need to wear the silver and gold that are the official school colors. Black jerseys are OK as the’ve been around for a long time, but out with the black helmets–and the white ones too. Gold helmets with silver pants, alternating with silver helmets and gold pants would be good. Nix on all black and all white!!
‘SkoBuffs!! Drub the Nubs.
Stuart, your polls are so thoughtful and on point. Appreciate you doing this and sharing it with your CUAtTheGame community.
Did Coach Hagan just let the cat out of the bag regarding Colorado’s starting QB?
Wouldn’t mind the Cheez-It Bowl at all, as I have connections at Kellogg’s (owns Cheez-it) who could get me tickets!! Is that Cheezy??? 🙂