Polls Archive

• Not concerned. CU has to get financial hits from past two years covered before taking on new projects (39%, 84 Votes)
• I understand waiting to spend, but announcing future plans couldn't hurt (34%, 73 Votes)
• It's an embarrassment. The lowest paid head coach; no plans for upgrades = loss of recruits (27%, 59 Votes)

Start Date: December 27, 2011 @ 8:55 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• I cheer for the Pac-12 team. R-E-S-P-E-C-T for the conference. (56%, 132 Votes)
• Is no different than any other bowl game. I'll watch Stanford/Oklahoma State; ignore UCLA/Illinois (37%, 86 Votes)
• I cheer for the opposition. Don't forget: Pac-12 teams are the E-N-E-M-Y (7%, 17 Votes)

Start Date: December 25, 2011 @ 6:17 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• I only track CU football, so I don't care either way (35%, 73 Votes)
• I track defections closely, as the fewer stars the Buffs have to face next fall, the better (33%, 69 Votes)
• I hope no players leave early. To be the best, you want to play the best at their best (32%, 67 Votes)

Start Date: December 23, 2011 @ 9:41 am
End Date: No Expiry

• Not concerned. The offer sheets for these players have BCS schools - that's a better measure of value. (50%, 151 Votes)
• A bit concerned. I don't want to have to hope for Signing Day miracles. Buff need a four-star commit - and soon! (38%, 115 Votes)
• Hate to admit it, but this is starting to look like a Dan Hawkins' class ... (12%, 36 Votes)

Start Date: December 21, 2011 @ 4:53 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• With the lack of depth along the D-line, it's a practical move. (60%, 127 Votes)
• Only acceptable if the coaches were upfront with the players about their chances of keeping their scholarship. (37%, 78 Votes)
• Some things are always wrong. If they all qualify, some player could be left without a promised scholarship. (3%, 7 Votes)

Start Date: December 20, 2011 @ 1:40 pm
End Date: No Expiry