Polls Archive

• Disagree. At a minimum, Cal or Washington will be bowl eligible (46%, 110 Votes)
• Sigh ... Sure would be a nice year for CU to be playing in the Pac-12 North (34%, 82 Votes)
• Agree. The Pac-12 North this year is the Big Two and Little Four (20%, 48 Votes)

Start Date: August 13, 2015 @ 6:43 am
End Date: No Expiry

• Bad idea. I'm pretty sure U.S. Senators have better things to do than worry about watching their home teams on DirecTV (39%, 90 Votes)
• My question ... Why didn't a Colorado senator sign on to this letter? (32%, 74 Votes)
• Great idea. This needs to get done, and done before the start of the season. (29%, 68 Votes)

Start Date: August 12, 2015 @ 7:48 am
End Date: No Expiry

• About right. It is what it is until the Buffs prove otherwise (66%, 205 Votes)
• Too low. CU is better than Oregon State, Washington State, and perhaps Washington (27%, 85 Votes)
• Too high. When you go 0-9 in Pac-12 play, there is no justification for a ranking higher than No. 12 (7%, 22 Votes)

Start Date: August 11, 2015 @ 7:46 am
End Date: No Expiry

• Somewhat agree. The situation has improved, but progress still means 4-6 wins this fall (57%, 168 Votes)
• Strongly agree. Facilities in place - easy early schedule ... It's time to win! (30%, 88 Votes)
• Disagree. The new facilities will affect future recruits and future results. CU still several years away from "no excuses" mandate (13%, 41 Votes)

Start Date: August 10, 2015 @ 7:34 am
End Date: No Expiry

• Like it. Having 12 identified leaders helps in spreading out the duties; recognizing leadership (51%, 96 Votes)
• Not really interested either way. If it helps, great. If it's a distraction, then it's a waste of time (39%, 75 Votes)
• Don't like it. Too much over-thinking. Let the team pick their top four leaders, and put them in charge (10%, 19 Votes)

Start Date: August 9, 2015 @ 9:16 am
End Date: No Expiry