Polls Archive

• It would be good to retain the matchup, but not at the expense of being excluded from a playoff semi-final scenario (47%, 67 Votes)
• It's time to junk all of the old bowl tie-ins. I want a true 4-8 team playoff. (39%, 56 Votes)
• The granddaddy of them all must be preserved! Pac-12/Big Ten matchup is sacrosanct! (14%, 20 Votes)

Start Date: April 26, 2012 @ 9:10 am
End Date: No Expiry

• But I will still be watching intently, as I am also a huge NFL fan (42%, 90 Votes)
• I never watch the draft. It's like watching paint dry (38%, 81 Votes)
• Without a pair of first rounders like last year, I will not be paying as close attention (20%, 44 Votes)

Start Date: April 24, 2012 @ 5:44 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• Good news! With nine Pac-12 games, CSU and a Big Ten team in future schedules, picking up a 1-A newbie sounds like a good move (51%, 125 Votes)
• Glad it's a 2-for-1 deal, but I'd rather play a lower FBS team in Texas or California (read: recruiting) (26%, 64 Votes)
• I'd rather see CU play Wyoming, Air Force, or even UNC. No upside here. (23%, 56 Votes)

Start Date: April 23, 2012 @ 9:52 am
End Date: No Expiry

• Which means nothing to me. It's CSU, after all ... (64%, 147 Votes)
• Which means that the Colorado State offense is terrible (31%, 71 Votes)
• Which means that the Colorado State defense must be pretty good (5%, 11 Votes)

Start Date: April 21, 2012 @ 8:25 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• Much ado about nothing. I, um, went to school in Boulder ... (47%, 86 Votes)
• It's an important topic, but neither Oregon nor the NCAA will act on it (33%, 60 Votes)
• And Oregon decides to lighten up on penalties for offenders? A black eye for the Ducks and Chip Kelly (20%, 37 Votes)

Start Date: April 20, 2012 @ 8:45 am
End Date: No Expiry