Polls Archive

• Fine with me. Keep the Rams guessing for as long as possible (60%, 148 Votes)
• Perhaps it's because ... CU is not two deep at every position (29%, 72 Votes)
• Name your starters and move on. With open practices, if opponents want to scout the Buffs, they can (11%, 25 Votes)

Start Date: August 17, 2013 @ 3:00 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• 2014 - Some growing pains this year, but a bowl is a definite goal next fall (46%, 122 Votes)
• 2015 - Just like at San Jose State, Mac & Co. have a three-year rebuilding project (28%, 73 Votes)
• 2013 - Buffs went 1-10 in 1984; bowling in 1985. It can happen! (22%, 57 Votes)
• 2016 or beyond - Will only revise when I start seeing actual W's posted (4%, 13 Votes)

Start Date: August 16, 2013 @ 3:11 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• Not headline worthy. What would you expect him to say? (39%, 96 Votes)
• I'm drinking the Kool-Aid! Paul & Co. will shock the league this fall! (36%, 88 Votes)
• Probably not quite right ... Maybe next year (if Richardson returns for his senior year) (25%, 62 Votes)

Start Date: August 15, 2013 @ 7:09 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• Just shows how desperate little brother is to keep up with the Buffs (43%, 110 Votes)
• Don't have an opinion. I refuse to read anything related to the Lambs (34%, 86 Votes)
• Upsets me ... that CSU has a hometown paper than bleeds green-and-gold, while CU has to fight uphill against media (23%, 60 Votes)

Start Date: August 14, 2013 @ 7:39 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• About right ... as hard as it is to admit. Just hope the rankings are better in December (72%, 209 Votes)
• Too low. CU is the lowest rated team in the Big 5 conferences, and that just isn't possible (16%, 48 Votes)
• Too high. Until it's proven on the field, the 2012 stats are CU's barometer (12%, 35 Votes)

Start Date: August 13, 2013 @ 7:32 pm
End Date: No Expiry