Polls Archive

• Pretty good. The team played better last year, and the addition of DC Jim Leavitt will make the difference (57%, 128 Votes)
• Slim. It will take not only CU stepping up, but another team stepping back, for CU to move up (36%, 82 Votes)
• None. It's hard to see CU moving past any of the five teams above them in 2015 (7%, 15 Votes)

Start Date: May 24, 2015 @ 9:43 am
End Date: No Expiry

• Considering it was about $18M the year before, and only $3.4M (partial cut) in FY12 - I'm happy (57%, 107 Votes)
• Like the upward trend, but I'm wary of the Pac-12 falling behind the SEC and Big Ten in future years (37%, 69 Votes)
• This is just the beginning of the end, as 100% ownership of the Pac-12 Networks will drag down the league (6%, 13 Votes)

Start Date: May 22, 2015 @ 4:44 pm
End Date: No Expiry

• The rankings are fair. Until proven otherwise, CU's offense is a part of the problem, and why the Buffs are continously ranked in the bottom third of the conference (68%, 159 Votes)
• Too low on most. These rankings are being posted more on won/loss records than results - CU's offense is not the problem (32%, 75 Votes)

Start Date: May 21, 2015 @ 10:48 am
End Date: No Expiry

• Maybe. Give it a year or two in the NFL, to see what issues might arise, before changing the rule (50%, 103 Votes)
• No. There is nothing wrong with having differences (like hashmark locations) between the NFL and NCAA (35%, 71 Votes)
• Yes. It would add some interest and intrigue to the extra point attempt (15%, 31 Votes)

Start Date: May 20, 2015 @ 8:01 am
End Date: No Expiry

• About right. Liufau has some work to do to win games, but is improving (72%, 184 Votes)
• Too low. Liufau set two dozen school records last year. CU has a quality quarterback! (22%, 57 Votes)
• Too high. When you go 0-9 in Pac-12 play, there is no reason for a ranking in single digits (6%, 13 Votes)

Start Date: May 19, 2015 @ 9:20 am
End Date: No Expiry