Polls Archive

• Somewhat of a problem. Owning 100% of the Pac-12 Networks will take time to pay off (49%, 84 Votes)
• Not a problem. CU taking in $20-$25M/year after getting $7-$10M in Big 12. Hard to complain (32%, 55 Votes)
• A real problem. Pac-12 teams can't fall behind $10M per team per year and hope to compete (19%, 32 Votes)

Start Date: March 7, 2015 @ 10:54 am
End Date: No Expiry

• That CU, when healthy and competing, is a better team than what we've been seeing the past month (62%, 150 Votes)
• Very little. It's still a lost season, a season which will end with a losing record (20%, 49 Votes)
• That CU's season is not done. A win over WSU will get the Buffs to .500. Post-season still a possibility! (18%, 43 Votes)

Start Date: March 6, 2015 @ 9:14 am
End Date: No Expiry

• Neither. Both have proven track records at CU. The 2014-15 season needs to be taken in context (67%, 206 Votes)
• Boyle no, but Lappe, yes. CU women's basketball has been in decline the past few seasons (30%, 94 Votes)
• Both. Sorry, but you must win to maintain job security, and neither has put forth a winning team (3%, 9 Votes)

Start Date: March 5, 2015 @ 10:04 am
End Date: No Expiry

• Definitely! I love to see the black-and-goal succeed, on any stage of competition! (70%, 162 Votes)
• Somewhat. It's nice to have some positive results in Pac-12 competition, but I'd trade them all for a winning football team (21%, 48 Votes)
• Not really. People only notice - and judge - schools by how the football and basketball teams fare (9%, 21 Votes)

Start Date: March 4, 2015 @ 10:24 am
End Date: No Expiry

• Love it! CU has been soft on defense for years. It's about time this gets corrected! (92%, 315 Votes)
• No problem with the sentiment ... but perhaps he should have kept it in house (8%, 26 Votes)
• Don't like it. Condemning previous coaches and calling your players weak not the way to get results (0%, 0 Votes)

Start Date: March 3, 2015 @ 12:53 pm
End Date: No Expiry