Polls Archive

• Hopeful. Not much in the way of offers, but he does appear to be a versatile player with speed (56%, 100 Votes)
• Nothing against Lewis, but the last three or four recruits have been lower profile (like past years), and that has me concerned (33%, 59 Votes)
• Excited. Another two-way star with good size and athleticism (11%, 21 Votes)

Start Date: July 3, 2016 @ 6:48 am
End Date: No Expiry

• I don't subscribe to premium sites. Sorry, but I don't have any idea what you are talking about (70%, 116 Votes)
• I'll take advantage of the $9.95 for six months offer from Scout, use both for the next few months, and take it from there (14%, 24 Votes)
• I will follow Adam to Scout and dump my Rivals subscription (13%, 22 Votes)
• I already subscribe to both sites (3%, 4 Votes)

Start Date: July 2, 2016 @ 8:16 am
End Date: No Expiry

• I'm okay with it. Gets CU out of Denver, and adds options for other non-conference scheduling (46%, 106 Votes)
• No. No. No. End the series. CU should not be giving "little brother" the time of day, much less equal status (31%, 73 Votes)
• Would rather have: "three years on, three years off" with a 2-for-1 in Boulder (23%, 53 Votes)

Start Date: July 1, 2016 @ 9:36 am
End Date: No Expiry

• No and Yes. Can't see Washington winning the North, but USC or UCLA will win the South (60%, 129 Votes)
• No and No. Stanford or Oregon in the North; a surprise (CU?) in the South (37%, 79 Votes)
• Yes and Yes. Huskies win the North; one of the L.A. schools will take the South (3%, 8 Votes)

Start Date: June 30, 2016 @ 9:36 am
End Date: No Expiry

• A three-star prospect who plays both as tight end and defensive end. Yes, please! (49%, 140 Votes)
• Only one Power-Five offer and not even rated by Rivals when he committed. I have to say I'm a bit skeptical (27%, 78 Votes)
• I'm just glad to see that CU is still recruiting tight ends (24%, 66 Votes)

Start Date: June 29, 2016 @ 8:28 am
End Date: No Expiry