Polls Archive

• Maybe. It's been good so far. Hopefully, momentum from the spring will continue (53%, 157 Votes)
• Definitely. In fact, it wouldn't surprise me if the ranking goes even higher (30%, 89 Votes)
• Probably not. Many powerhouse schools only have a handful of commits, and will have lapped the Buffs come Signing Day (17%, 53 Votes)

Start Date: July 5, 2016 @ 7:50 am
End Date: No Expiry

• Low. The Buffs are deep at running back, and perhaps Carr could see his playing time being minimized with the large group of backs in the depth chart (56%, 138 Votes)
• High. Carr performed well as a freshman and had the greatest upside on the roster. I'm also concerned about the timing of the announcement (44%, 108 Votes)

Start Date: July 4, 2016 @ 6:53 am
End Date: No Expiry

• Hopeful. Not much in the way of offers, but he does appear to be a versatile player with speed (56%, 100 Votes)
• Nothing against Lewis, but the last three or four recruits have been lower profile (like past years), and that has me concerned (33%, 59 Votes)
• Excited. Another two-way star with good size and athleticism (11%, 21 Votes)

Start Date: July 3, 2016 @ 6:48 am
End Date: No Expiry

• I don't subscribe to premium sites. Sorry, but I don't have any idea what you are talking about (70%, 116 Votes)
• I'll take advantage of the $9.95 for six months offer from Scout, use both for the next few months, and take it from there (14%, 24 Votes)
• I will follow Adam to Scout and dump my Rivals subscription (13%, 22 Votes)
• I already subscribe to both sites (3%, 4 Votes)

Start Date: July 2, 2016 @ 8:16 am
End Date: No Expiry

• I'm okay with it. Gets CU out of Denver, and adds options for other non-conference scheduling (46%, 106 Votes)
• No. No. No. End the series. CU should not be giving "little brother" the time of day, much less equal status (31%, 73 Votes)
• Would rather have: "three years on, three years off" with a 2-for-1 in Boulder (23%, 53 Votes)

Start Date: July 1, 2016 @ 9:36 am
End Date: No Expiry